阿郎的故事

HD

主演:周润发,张艾嘉,黄坤玄,吴孟达,王天林

类型:电影地区:中国香港语言:粤语年份:1989

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 无尽

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 优质

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 红牛

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.1阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.2阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.3阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.4阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.5阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.6阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.13阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.14阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.15阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.16阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.17阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.18阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.19阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.20

 剧情介绍

阿郎的故事电影免费高清在线观看全集。
  阿郎(周润发 饰)年轻时作为出色的赛车手很是放荡不羁,却不妨碍富家女波波(张艾嘉 饰)对其一往情深。波波不顾家人反对,同他结婚并怀下身孕后,发现阿郎背着她还有其它女人,于是愤然离去。波波临盆之际,阿郎参加非法赛车撞死警察入狱。波波被母亲和医生欺骗婴儿夭折,后去了美国生活。出狱后,阿郎为以前行为愧疚,从孤儿院找回儿子取名“波仔”(黄坤玄 饰)。父子二人开始相依为命过日子。  十年后,已有未婚夫的波波回港又遇阿郎,得知波仔是自己的儿子后,想将其带去美国。内心仍深爱波波的阿郎为了证明自己已有彻底改变,决定不顾年纪和身体状况再战赛场。微热请回答1997鬼打鬼之灵幻天师纪子,去首尔吧她的一生2011九天诱杀过早埋葬亚特兰大号我不是精英绀田照的合法食谱男狐聊斋芝加哥急救第四季列夫·朗道:三日我可以毁掉你腐败2019玫瑰艾勒沙高家台月殒天劫天生一对2022开心的八月日落黄沙英语梁上君子至尊骗术:以环保之名你的儿子神探蒲松龄富春山居园丁1912潮涨海岸蝙蝠侠大战幻影人权力的缰绳:马上舞步的艺术女法医绅士爱美人妙女神探第六季007之诺博士恶劣天气咕咕是一只猫晓看天色暮看云老爸入侵记龙虎砵兰街

 长篇影评

 1 ) 又见阿郎—2003

1989年,周润发34岁,张艾嘉36岁;
2003年,周润发48岁,张艾嘉50岁了。
真是岁月如飞刀他刀刀催人老啊。

我今天说的又见阿郎,可不是前些年杜琪峰导演的〈再见阿郎〉,我是说我又见到了阿郎——还不明白?就是说我今天又看了一遍〈阿郎的故事〉,这回明白了吧。

这电影不知看了多少遍,录像机里、录像厅里、电影院里、电视里、电脑里、VCD的、SVCD的、DVD的、D5的、D9的......,可今天还是不争气,波仔哭的时候、阿朗哭的时候、阿郎死的时候,我还是差点几度落泪。

同样的电影,每次看都有不同的感受。这次我体会到了配角,是一部电影中多么重要的因素啊。吴孟达这个老戏精,实在没想到在上世纪80年代末就已经炉火纯青了。还记得都市情缘吗?老家伙让我掉眼泪了,那是我第一次开始尊敬他。

电影音乐也同样的重要,罗大佑的两首歌和影片配合得天衣无缝、恰如其分,杜大炮煽情本事也真是不小,阿郎死在〈你的样子〉里,先是鲜血灌满了头盔,然后阿郎加速、夺冠、休克、失控、摔倒、爆炸、慢镜、哭喊、拉扯、奔跑、拥抱、字幕......听到歌声,听到了心撕裂的声音,让人久久不能离去,电影散场了还会呆坐在椅子上,是等待阿郎的复活还是想听完那首动人的歌曲?

我其实是个感情丰富的人,但看电影总想忍住不掉眼泪,可是一次又一次的使我不相信自己不容易被打动。而电影里最普通的镜头、最平凡的瞬间也最能打动我。
阿郎和波仔在大街上走,阿郎玩失踪,波仔找不到他,阿郎突然从身后出现当街脱他儿子的裤子,然后父子俩互相追逐打闹渐渐远去。
还有阿郎赶儿子跟他妈妈回美国,儿子不肯,郎大怒,一顿毒打,儿子把妈妈买的衣服全扔出了窗外,最后非常懂事的边抽噎着边收拾东西走人,临走还倔倔的要二十块钱车钱。儿子走了,阿朗蜷缩在椅子里,无声的哭泣。
脸上的鼻子酸了又酸,眼眶有东西转了又转,心头为之一震,刺痛。

这使我想起了我爸跟我曾经说过他小时候最受不了的电影桥段:
老人:石头!!!
小孩:爷爷!!!
镜头拉开,祖孙俩从远处相向奔跑,越来越近越来越近,镜头一切,爷儿俩砰的一声撞在一起相拥而泣......我爸这时拉回记忆,对我说:"这是我最受不了的,想起来都要掉眼泪!"
遗传这东西也真让人受不了!

再说说导演杜琪峰杜大炮,此君着实NB到家,如果只看过枪火暗战孤男寡女瘦身男女等影片才说他强的朋友真应该进行一下电影普及教育,像〈阿郎的故事〉、〈天若有情〉什么的。他把此片的温情一段一段展现给你,然后在一个马上就要大团圆的时候给这些温情找了个极其悲壮的爆发点,让你不知所措,只好以泪洗面喽。

再说发哥,其实以他的岁数叫他发叔也未尝不可。发哥的阿郎是演技最棒的经典形象之一,他凭此片勇夺1990年香港金像奖最佳男主角,那几年也是发哥如日中天的时候。之前发哥得奖如家常便饭,随便列举一些:1987年主演《英雄本色》和《秋天的童话》(台湾名《流氓大亨》),分别获香港电影金像奖和第二十四届金马奖最佳男主角奖。1988年因主演《龙虎风云》,获第七届香港电影金像奖最佳男主角奖和美国电影协会颁发的亚洲杰出演员奖。90年是他最后一次在香港得奖,他也就此半隐退状态N年,这是后话,按下不表。

还有那个童星,凭此片也得了个亚太地区最佳新人奖和金马奖最佳男配角————————的提名!他叫黄坤玄,地道的童星,饰演波仔,把他的顽皮、聪明及善解人意表现得淋漓尽致,现在在好莱坞谋求发展。当然给他配音的演员同样功不可没,两个字,传神!

说了这么多没用的,感触最深的还是电影本身——当你被一个电影感动时,你的心已经慢慢靠近了天堂。。。。。。
                                                 2003。4。

 2 ) 怎舍浮云和蓝天——从《阿郎的故事》到《克莱默夫妇》看家长制和法治之间的我们

怎舍浮云和蓝天——从《阿郎的故事》到《克莱默夫妇》看家长制和法治之间的我们


1979年的圣诞节前夕,在美国上映了一部片子叫《克莱默夫妇》,获得了第五十二届奥斯卡奖。十年之后,1989年,杜琪峰在香港导演了《阿郎的故事》,成为港片中的经典。我昨晚才看这部电影,流了三次泪,最后我想到的是《克莱默夫妇》中关于相似问题的处理,当然杜导可能也有模仿之的痕迹。
二十几年前的香港,和中国的今天很类似,处于在城市化的进程中,四处是建设。阿郎就像现在的一个中国民工,他年轻时当混混,泡上了富家小姐波波,生了孩子,结果阿郎死性不改,在波波产期和别的女人乱来,二人发生冲突,波波家人“打掉”孩子,她就只身去了美国。那是1978年的事,十年,阿郎带着孩子长大,而十年也是两部影片相差的时间,波波回来要孩子。
这和《克莱默夫妇》面临一样的问题,就是孩子归谁?克莱默和他妻子自然而然的选择了法律解决问题,虽然克莱默当时也面临再就业,但是他的积蓄拿出来,还是可以打一场官司。而阿郎的积蓄拿出来,只够为小孩买一条癞皮狗。
在影片中,阿郎虽然也因为不识英文合同,提到要让他的“律师”看看,但是他那样的一个工地卡车司机,有什么律师来罩他呢?他换回孩子的逻辑,就是成名或有钱。为了这个,他最后把命搭在了赛车上。
对克莱默而言,在圣诞节前夜一天能找到一个体面的工作,这样的事情在阿郎身上不会发生,他所能做的就是投机,用命一搏。阿郎的故事展现了一个普通中国人的出路,从奋斗到失败,人们在他的故事里看到了自己,人们消费着那种悲情,“我听到传来的谁的声音,像那梦里呜咽中的小河。”
正如听到姚洋教授所言,为了要三四千块而回家过年的“民工”,是不会去诉诸法律的。而我这个快三十的人,在中国还没有接触过法庭,法对我们中国人而言,或许总是一个避而远之,尽量不去触及的东西。
这好比一个没有什么身份的中国人去看病,他更愿意找一家私人医院或者诊所,而条件反射式的不去大医院。因为这在他看来,小诊所可以讨价还价,程序的成本低,而自我的主导性更大。这和菜场买菜,网上买打折衣服,看话剧买黄牛票等一样的道理。我们认为在有的“地方”是讨不到便宜的或者会吃亏的。
我们的国家机器何时能给人的感觉不再是冷冰冰的,“为人民服务”这句话何时能不再显得高高在上,或者说“人民”何时能真正的当家作主?或许时间真的能解决这些问题?或许二十几后,我们也会如香港人回望《阿郎的故事》那样显得有些陌生?什么时候,我们能够已经生活的如同克莱默夫妇?
而相较两部影片,《阿郎的故事》以阿郎的悲剧为结尾,成全了波波和波仔的母子情深,这是一个有结果的片子。《克莱默夫妇》中的小男孩最后虽然归属于父亲,但是母亲并非就以“死亡”告终,母亲还有她的生活,故事还是可以继续。二者相比,前者更多的体现了一种中国式的悲欢大结局,但是也带有时代的宿命论色彩。后者给了一个更加开放的回答,每个人都回到自己的生活轨迹,以后这种轨迹也还有可能再交叉。
在整个中国式的叙事中,阿郎还是争取波波的归来,希望一家团圆,他也用痴情和怀旧的方式来挽回家庭的悲剧诞生。而克莱默夫妇可以只用瞒着小孩打一场或两场官司就行了,这在他们的环境或者朋友圈里,诸如出庭作证、法律手续等都很正常。而阿郎则是通过朋友的关系、儿子和母亲的亲昵、场景的恋情怀旧等来挽回,如插曲里的“水汪汪的黑眼睛笑态多亲善”。
这基本体现了两种不同社会情境和结构下人的选择,前者更加传统而亲情,后者更加现代而程序,虽然都饱含了人的情感在里面。只是,前者在没有一个社会保障的体系下,个人付出的成本要更加巨大。换而言之,前者是缺乏保障的,后者是有一个有“第三者”(法规)插足的。
中国的传统社会是有一个“家长”可以站出来说句“公道话”的,而在《阿郎的故事》里阿郎似乎就是一个孤儿,而波波也不听从母亲的劝解,最后母亲的插手,就是打掉孩子,告诉她孩子已经死了。在阿郎的故事里,家长制带来了可怕的结果,也说明了它的危险性。这或许也在于家长是会“亲亲互隐”的徇私舞弊,如此失去了客观和公平性。
而在现代社会,家长制在信息化和个性解放中,慢慢变得脆弱,家长有时甚至主动把选择和决策的权力,交给了儿女。“你们商量着办吧!”而在法治尚且不健全的情况下,儿女的商量也只能如阿郎一样,付出巨大的个人代价。减少这种代价的过程,就是我们的现代制度建设的过程。
在父母不灵、法治不全的时代,我们的生存需要更大的智慧,而这也是现代中国刺激的地方,我们痛并快乐着,“这是最好的时代,也是最坏的时代。”两百年前狄更斯的话,依然受用。
《阿郎恋曲》里唱的“一生匆匆,怎舍浮云和蓝天”,我们匆匆然的一生,在这样的时代,经历着将一去不返的往事浮云,一面怀望着远处的湛蓝天空。“我能望着一片湖,比我们家乡的更秀丽,虽然比较生疏。”这是拜伦的感叹。

2012-6-29,筑思于汉口。

 3 ) 男人的样板

当鲜血满面的阿郎驾着赛车风驰电掣冲过终点之后摇摇晃晃摔倒在地的时候
当波仔和波波从一脸的喜悦瞬间转为满脸泪水继而疯狂奔入赛车跑道的时候
当阿郎的脸在赛车爆炸的火光中若隐若现的时候
当罗大佑的"你的样子"再一次在耳边响起的时候
俺起身关了正在努力制冷的空调
尽管室外温度超过35摄氏度
因为
突然俺感到冷极了
这是一种彻底的深入骨髓的寒冷
一种无可名状的悲哀迅速地在体内扩散
......

"人真的不能做错事,做错了一辈子都翻不了身"
"Man should never do thing wrong.Once you do ,game over."
阿郎一脸悔恨在说这句话时
一定不曾想到
有些错事将会用自己的性命来改正
却原来英语台词早已有了提示----Game over!

十年前
波波顶住家庭的压力与阿郎一起生活
可有一天
阿郎亲手打走了已有身孕的波波
波波生下波仔后就远渡重洋
整整十年
阿郎单身一人带着波仔打拼生活
影片讲述的就是十年后阿郎波仔再次遇见波波的情感故事

阿郎一直就不是个好男人
直到当波波提出带波仔去美国的时候
阿郎受到了严峻的考验
有些男人非到关键是看不出其责任心
阿郎就是
处于社会底层的阿郎曾是小混混的阿郎经常在街头飙车的阿郎进过监狱的阿郎
除了身边可爱的波仔
这一辈子真的什么都没有
波仔是他最宝贵的财产
很难想象就是这么个男人
会同意让波波带走波仔
并且在波仔不愿意离开他的时候
狠狠的揍了波仔一顿
硬是把波仔推到波波的身边
......

当波仔哭着闹着寻找老爸最终在赛场上扑到老爸怀里的时候
当阿郎为了波仔的生活重出江湖再次跨上赛车准备赢取这次比赛的时候
当波波明白了什么是十年的父子感情明白谁又深深爱着她决定留下来陪伴阿郎和波仔的时候
....
当一切随人心愿万事如意顺利发展的时候
悲剧发生了
在撞击声爆炸声喊声哭声和一片火光漫天硝烟中
依旧自信乐观阿郎的生命却随着"你的样子"渐渐消逝

我听到传来的谁的声音象那梦里呜咽中的小河
我看到远去的谁的步伐遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
......


若按五星评定法
此片在俺心中是五星
决无疑问

 4 ) 风华绝代周润发

不知是第几次看此片。算是最喜欢的老电影之一。
因为知道是怎样的结局,从开头就难过。

1989年的爱情是那样的吗?
年轻人都跳迪斯科,每个人都穿得跟猫王似的。
女孩子头上总要扎个夸张的蝴蝶结。
赛车的,除了受伤就是死掉。活下来的也碌碌无为后半身。
那车上的风光,都是后半生的陪葬。

周润发演的阿郎,张艾嘉演的波波。阿郎看着波波的男朋友一脸的复杂表情,嘴都气歪了。波波的眼里却闪过一丝狡黠的喜悦,又马上故作镇定。不知是否是导演杜琪峰恰好捕捉到。倘若这是张艾嘉的演绎,真是细致到骨子里了。
波仔从出场开始,就让人心疼。虽然短短几天就被冒出来的妈妈用各种物质收买,阿郎给他买的dudu都不看一眼,毕竟是个孩子。可最后,还是哭着喊着要回家。
为什么并不觉得这个剧情很常见呢?这种纯粹的感情现在哪里可以看到呢?
没有父母为了抚养孩子的负担把孩子推来推去;没有女人对男人背叛的仇恨;更没有任何一个人表现出任何自私。

当阿郎大叫着,没有波仔,我就什么都没有了。
当波波大叫着,你以为只有你一个人没有波仔就什么都没有吗?我已经不能生育了。
当阿郎打着波仔赶出门,又躲起来大哭。
当波仔打电话回家哭着问老爸你为什么不理我啊?

他们曾经是那样的深爱着对方,现在只能把这份爱统统转移到波仔身上。除了波仔,似乎没有什么能联系起了。
就如同波波说的,我不恨你,没办法恨,我也没办法再爱你了。怎么可能那么轻易就算了,就和好。你欠我的,我就是没办法释怀。你在我怀孕时候跟别人乱搞,你把我推下楼梯,我怎么可能再跟你生活下去。
阿郎却重新踏上了赛车的道路,那条非死即伤的真理再次被验证。
人出来混,迟早都要还的。

好不容易,波波真实的面对自己的内心,重新回到赛车场。
好不容易,阿郎鼓起勇气,为了带波仔去美国找波波,重新回到赛车场。
好不容易,这一家像是要团圆的样子。
却变成一场撕心裂肺的火光。
于是,什么都没了。

悲剧,原来可以是破镜重圆后再摔碎。

只是,这里面有太多美好。
十年的落魄生活,十年的拉扯孩子。
让人轻易就原谅阿郎,同情阿郎。

最痛该是波波吧。
好不容易有勇气面对爱人了,却眼睁睁看着他丧身车祸与火海。
那双乌溜溜的大眼睛和那张笑脸,却是他再也见不到的了。

“我听到传来的谁的声音,象那梦里呜咽中的小河;
我看到远去的谁的步伐,遮住告别时哀伤的眼神。
不明白的是为何你情愿,让风尘刻画你的样子;
就向早已忘情的世界,曾经拥有你的名字我的声音。
不变的你,伫立在茫茫的尘世中。
聪明的孩子,提着易碎的灯笼。
潇洒的你,将心事化进尘缘中。
孤独的孩子,你是造物的恩宠。”
罗大佑

----
杜琪峰的片子,总是在时装剧里拍出古装的江湖味道。
电影一出来就是灰尘满屏的工地,男神周润发灰头土脸,衣衫凌乱,不过是一名开着变形金刚大土车的工人。岔出一句,年轻时候的玩乐,都要年老的受苦来换取的。可就是男神身上一股浓浓的江湖味让人欲罢不能。
发哥还是少拍满城尽带黄金甲这样的。给他赋予真性情才像那么回事,小马哥、赌神、许文强。发哥,你演没文化却有心肠的真汉子时,真的风华绝代。
原谅我偏爱港片,欢迎与我聊天。

 5 ) Sean Gilman: All About Ah-Long

//theendofcinema.net/2016/02/01/running-out-of-karma-all-about-ah-long/

Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simple moral reading.

After an auspicious, if commercially unsuccessful, debut with the New Wave wuxiaThe Enigmatic Case in 1980, To spent the early 80s working in Hong Kong television. In 1986 he returned to film working under Raymond Wong Bak-ming at the Cinema City studio, he he made the popular, if not especially distinguished comediesHappy Ghost 3 andSeven Years Itch. These were followed in 1988 by a pair of films, the smash hit farceThe Eighth Happiness and the contemporary crime pictureThe Big Heat. He followed that up in 1989 withAll About Ah-Long,a domestic melodrama that becamethe number one film of the year at the Hong Kong box office, the second year in a row a To film had accomplished that feat.The film reunited To withEighth Happiness star Chow Yun-fat andSeven Years Itchstar Sylvia Chang. Like all of To’s previous four films it was produced by Raymond Wong for Cinema City, but it is a much more dramatically ambitious work. Cinema City at their best was a freewheeling, anarchic studio where anything was possible. The loose atmosphere was responsible for some of the greatest films of the decade (in Hong Kong or otherwise), but also a whole lot of just bizarrely silly nonsense (the Yuen-Woo-ping directedMismatched Couples, for example, in which Yuen tried to make Donnie Yen a star with a breakdancing comedy).The Eighth Happinessexemplified the lunatic side of the studio, an improvisational, tasteless and often hilarious comedy that helped establish the template for a certain type of all-star Lunar New Year comedy (a tradition that continues to this day).

All About Ah-Long, though, is a real movie. Written by stars Chow and Chang (an unusual credit for Chow (his only other story credit is on the 1995 Wai Ka-fai film Peace Hotel), while Chang had already begun the move from movie and pop star to accomplished writer/director), it takes Oscar winnerKramer vs. Kramer as a starting point. Chow plays a construction worker raising his ten year old son, Porky. A former motorcycle racer and drunk, Chow is loud and crude but cares deeply for his kid. When his friend Ng Man-tat (in one of his early dramatic roles, before he became Stephen Chow’s favorite comic foil) gets Porky an audition for a kids’ fashion commercial, they discover that the commercial’s director is Chang, the boy’s mother, returned from America for the first time in a decade. Brief flashbacks fill out the story (Chow was philanderingand abusive and ended up briefly in jail after a motorcycle accident; Chang’s mother hated him and told Chang her son had died after she moved with her to the US), while Chang tries to build a relationship with her son and Chow tries to rekindle his romance with Chang.

It’s an against-type performance from Chow, as arguably the coolest man in cinema in the late-80s dresses down with patched-together clothes and a hideous mop of hair. He’s a deeply flawed man who is completely aware of his faults. Chang is the class opposite: intelligent and reserved, she is the wealth of America, trying to win Porky’s affection with all the things and opportunities she can muster. This is one of the things that distinguishesAh-Long from its American progenitor: whileKramer vs. Kramer paints a complicated picture of 1970s feminism (the breakdown of the home as the wife seeks a life in the workforce),Ah-Longis moreof a class allegory. There’s no expectation that Chang should abandoned her career to be Chow’s housewife, such a thing is unthinkable. However there’s a deep undercurrent of unease with Chang’s cosmopolitan wealth. Both parents want Porky to have all the advantages wealth can confer (education, nutrition, culture, adventure), but there’s an inauthenticity to her world. The film opens with shots of Hong Kong streets, notably not the skyscrapers and businessmen and other conspicuous symbols of the capitalist paradise that was the colony in the late 1980s, but rather of narrow, crowded alleys, packed with shops and debris. It isn’t the gangland slum of the Kowloon Walled City that Johnnie To grew up in, instead it’s a less hyperbolic, more imaginable kind of everyday poverty. Throughout, To will contrast realist images of working class Hong Kong with the glossier sheen of its upper class, mixing aclass-conscious New Wave aesthetic with the pop song montages ofcommercial cinema. When Porky first visits his mother in her hotel (the “Oriental”) he gazes in wonder at the shiny white surfaces, and especially the glass elevator rising infinitely upward at the lobby’s core. Elevators will become a recurring image and location throughout To’s career, a symbol of fear, of entrapment, of the unknown. The image is built upon in a later section ofAh-Long, when Porky and Chang goes to an amusement park and she can’t handle the vertiginous ups and downs of the rides. Porky loves it of course, ping-ponging between highs and lows, but Chang needs to stay on one level: she can’t go back down.

In many ways, Johnnie To’s most recent film is a kind of spiritual sequel toAll About Ah-Long. Reunited with Chow and Chang for the first time in over 20 years, and adapting a play written by Chang,Office is about a pair of young office workers who learn that life at the top of the corporate elevator is more corrupt than they could imagine. Chow and Chang play the oldest couple, the company’s CEO and Owner, long engaged in an amoral struggle for power over each other. A middle couple forms the heart of the film, played by Tang Wei and Eason Chan: Chan is already corrupted, Tang is on her way there. The two share a duet (the film is a musical, with songs by Lo Ta-yu, who also did the music forAll About Ah-Long) where they sing of their hometowns, paradises where there was no ambition. All the corruption of the corporate world is the result of aspiration, of the drive to rise up, to bend and break the rules of conscience in the name of things. Chan is haunted by a recurring nightmare of an elevator: not of falling down an empty shaft, but pointedly being crushed on the ground floor. Porky inAh-Long watches with hope as an elevator rises, Chan cowers in fear as one falls.

I can’t write aboutAll About Ah-Long without addressing it’s ending, so here’s where you can check out if you haven’t seen the film and care about spoilers. Unless I can track down a copy of his two-part TV movieThe Iron Butterfly, the next film in the series with be a New Years comedy reunion with Chow and Chang,The Fun, The Luck and the Tycoon, to be followed by To’s first collaboration with screenwriter Wai-Ka-fai,TheStory of My Son.

Like many a Hong Kong film,All About Ah-Long has a doubleending. David Bordwell writes about the end of the 1987 Chow Yun-fat melodramaAn Autumn’s Tale (directed by Mabel Cheung), where the romantic couple separates at the end, with Chow’s deadbeat failing to win the more upwardly-mobile woman. This is followed by a brief epilogue, set sometime in the future, where the lovers meet again with Chow having miraculously cleaned up his act and become a financial success. Bordwell notes that the multiple, tonally opposite endings work to give the audience a range of ways to react to the film: they get both the happy and tragic endings and therefore a more total experience of melodrama.All About Ah-Long takes the experience to another, emotionally pummeling, level. After a long decline into sadness, where Porky leaves with Chang (with Chow delivering a heart-breakingHarry and the Hendersonsdriving-the-boy-away scene),and then changes his mind and returns to his dad. Chow then decides to race again and gets a haircut and a motorcycle. Father and son head to the Macao Grand Prix, where Chang shows up just as the race is about to start: the family at last will be reunited, with a newly cleaned-up Chow finally worthy of being a husband and father. He races, he’s about to win, and then he crashes. But he gets back on his bike (because that’s what we do), despitea significant head injury (a chance blow from another motorcycle). Summoning all his strength, with intercut shots of his wildly supportivefamily, Chow comes back and wins the race. Porky and Chang leap with joy as Chow, in excruciating slow motion, loses control of his bike and crashes into a wall. He watches his family rush toward him as the motorcycle explodes and he is engulfed in flames. The credits roll over documentary-style slo-mo footage of the wreckage, the horror in the crowd, the anguished faces of mother and son. It’s an astonishing, flabbergasting ending. Such a finale would be unthinkable in a Hollywood movie (can you imagine a film with equivalent-level stars, say Leonardo DiCaprio and Charlize Theron, where the family is just about to get back together but instead Leo dies right at the end? There would be riots in the streets.)

This ending is vital for To’s idea of the film, the sharp, unexpected swerve into tragedy is something he’ll return to again and again in his career. In his interview with Stephen Teo, he says thatAll About Ah-Long was “the first film in which I could line everything up in one go; as the film that was made really from my own thoughts. I am grateful to Chow Yun-fat, who gave me many of his own insights, and also to Sylvia Chang, who actually wrote the treatment and was involved in the production, She disagreed with my ending but I told her I was making the film because of the ending. It may be flawed but I insisted upon it.” The ending is crushing not so much because of its shockingness, although that is certainly a factor, but also because the happier ending that preceded it made so much sense: everything about the surface of the film tells us that this is the kind of movie that will end happily, the two beautiful stars will get back together and their family will be whole. But the ending brings out the darkness, the fear and paranoia that underlies so many of the preceding images, the class contrasts, the vertiginous heights and grimy lows of pre-Handover Hong Kong.The Big Heat too is motivated by an apocalyptic fear of the Handover, as Britain and China agreed that the colony would be handed back to the Mainland, the child’s fate determined by the whims of its parent nations. This strain of paranoia is so present in the Hong Kong cinema of the period that it’s become a critical cliche to remark upon it, like the Cold War dread of 1950s American sci-fi films. Butthere’s an even deeper,more universal fearinAll About Ah-Long, where the paranoia is motivated by diaspora, the promise of wonder in life outside China, but is rooted in a more basic class anxiety: the fear that moving up means becoming inauthentic.

For To and Chow, who grew up relatively impoverished and were now at the pinnacle of their professions, that must have been a very real concern. Chang had a different childhood, born in Taiwan she also spent time in Hong Kong and New York growing up, before dropping out of school to pursue singing and acting at age 16. The film is thus a recreation of the real-life dynamics between the two male auteurs and the female one. It has been pointed out that contrary to expectations in this melodrama the male character is far more emotionally expressive than the female one, with Chow giving a loud, dynamic performance where Chang is cool and internalized (there is a lifelong relationship in a nutshell in a simple eyeroll Chang gives as she sits on the back of Chow’s moped). This is less agender matter though than a class one I think: Chow’s manners are boorish where Chang is refined. The tension between the three artists is vital to the push-pull nature of the melodrama: neither parent is demonized or lionized as the film goes on, both characters are warm and loving to their son, both are full of regrets for their actions a decade earlier (though Chow has more to regret), both want to be forgiving to each other, both know that that is impossible. But ultimately it’s To’s vision that wins out, and it’s a deeply pessimistic one: Ah-Long, a poor but happy man for the first time in his life aspiring to greatness, seeing his dream within reach and then literally exploding. It isn’t a tragic ending, in the sense that it is totally unpredictable: Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simplemoral reading. Just as inOffice,aspiration ultimately leads to self-destruction, but that destruction can manifest itself in wildly unexpected ways. This black strain, the doom of a universe governed by fate that operates through chance, will surface again and again through To’s career, mixed as it is with farces and romances and stories of brotherhood, moments of liberation and freedom and darkest despair.All About Ah-Long, his first truly great film,is the first to fully express this multiplicity of moods.

 6 ) 让我在别人的爱情中无奈死吧

《阿郎的故事》讲了一个无奈的爱情,发哥还有部《秋天的童话》爱情也挺无奈的,同样表现这种无奈到极端的是韩国的情色电影《情人》,简直无奈到了无理,无奈到根本不交待为啥无奈,她就是不喜欢他,哪怕他很帅(忧郁的眼神,唏嘘的胡渣子),是作家,有钱(有一所大房子,有很大的落地窗户),有才,温柔(话很少,眼光如水),浪漫(带她到海边),体贴(内裤都自己洗自己熨),顾家(很会买好吃的外卖)。。。她就是不喜欢他,于是他想不通,只好把她喜欢的那个他给杀死,然后掐死她,自己也自杀。这种无奈就只能是艺术片,似懂非懂中觉得很牛B。这样的导演和这样的电影并不能唬住象我这样挑剔的看碟人。

《阿郎的故事》和《秋天的童话》都是建立在现实上的无奈,所以更让人绝望,更加让人感到命运的无情生活的残酷。更让我感叹。后来韩国果然不甘落后,近20年过去了模仿《阿郎的故事》拍了个烂俗搞笑的《别让爸爸知道》,把《阿郎的故事》中搞笑的部分模仿到恶心,例如同样是表现家里空间小,厕所不够用,《别让爸爸知道》演得极度恶心,我就不说了,恶心到我不想复述。

《阿郎的故事》再一次说明,一个人的成功并非偶然,这部电影的出版日期1989,并且获了当年的金像奖,17年前就能导出这样的电影,杜棋峰的成功并非偶然。17年过去了,多少电影都在证明着“重温旧梦就是破坏旧梦”这句话,时间却把杜琪峰这部电影磨砺成为经典。

《阿郎的故事》情节并不复杂,但是讲了个命运与爱情的故事,爱情在命运交错中变得如此的无奈。阿郎、波波,波仔。阿郎年轻时是个飙车一族的小阿飞,当然也会比赛算个赛车手吧,波波乃是大家闺秀,但凡大家闺秀,因为从小家教的关系,对于飙风高手们都会充满了好奇与崇拜,年纪又小又对家庭管束产生逆反心理时便会爱上小混混们。于是他们相爱了,家里当然不同意啊,母亲提着她的衣服丢到门外,一句话:以后别进这个门儿。这种情况实际中基本上不可能发生,此电影中生硬处之一。

她愿意和她生活在狭窄的小房间,跟着他疯跑,趴在他摩托车后兜风,她怀孕了,他自然是负不起责任的,因为他并不比她年纪大,还不懂对自己负责又怎能对老婆孩子负责,于是,她挺着大肚子,提着饭盒到场地给他送饭时,看到他抱着另一个女人疯狂的做活塞运动,她震惊了,扔掉饭盒跑回家,收拾衣服要离开他,他先好言相劝,她不吃敬酒吃罚酒,于是他把她推出房间,她沿着楼梯滚下去。。。。。。

她长大了,懂事了,跟着全家移民美国,他撞了人,被判2年监,出狱后他去她家,丈母娘告诉他,她对你死心了,孩子在孤儿院。。。。。

他把孩子带到10几岁了,取名波仔。

她从美国回来,一切已经不同,他仍是他,她却不再是她了,他指责她10年前离他而去,抛却孩子不顾,她说那年妈妈告诉她说孩子已经死了。他责备她,这令我很不理解,当初可是你对不起女方在先啊。此电影处生硬处之二。

她接受高等教育属于上流社会,他则每况愈下,她还喜欢他吗?喜欢!他们能再生活在一起吗?不能,这就是命运,好在他挣扎了一下终于发现自己和她已经是两重天两个世界的人了。爱情被命运阻隔已经无法再破镜重圆了,看到这里我也很痛心,很无奈,是啊,偶尔在一起,阔别重逢话当初浪漫是有,可是生活呢?朝夕相处呢?尽管她把他们曾经一起生活过的地方那个重新布置一新,尽管她不惜一切金钱时间弥补母爱,她想要孩子,因为孩子可以跟着她受好的教育不用再重复爸爸的命运。

他只有屈从于命运,最后他准备再赛一场,给孩子一个好的家。结果,他死在赛车场。她带孩子回美国。矛盾就化解了。他们无法生活在一起,然而我们又想看到大团圆的结局,导演只好这样大团圆了。

他死了,所有生硬处都不再生硬了,他责备她是因为10年来又当爹又当妈的委屈,他用死来赎罪,还清自己10年前推她下楼的旧债,因为命运就是人生不能重来,他只能用这样的方式和命运搏斗,做个悲壮的失败者。

和《秋天的童话》不同,这里的发哥从头到尾都和她不是同一个阶层的人,《秋天的童话》结尾很美好,他在海边买下了店面,一直在等着她到来,有一天,她来了。因为这个美好的结局,所以只能叫 童话 而不是故事。

现实肯定比故事更残酷。

电影的结尾,发哥的摩托燃起大火,罗大佑那沧桑的歌声响起:

我听到传来的谁的声音
像那梦里呜咽中的小河
我看到远去的谁的步伐
遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
不明白的是为何你情愿
让风尘刻画你的样子
就像早已忘情的世界
曾经拥有你的名字我的声音
那悲歌总会在梦中清醒
诉说一点哀伤过的往事
那看似漫不在乎转过身的
是风干的泪眼后潇瑟的影子
不明白的是为何人世间
总不能溶解你的样子
是否来迟了明日的渊源
早谢了你的笑容我的心情
不变的你
伫立在茫茫的尘世中
聪明的孩子
提着易碎的灯笼
潇洒的你
将心事化尽尘缘中
孤独的孩子
你是造物的恩宠
提着心爱的灯笼
1.《你的样子》作为这部电影的片尾曲再合适不过了。

2.张艾嘉和秋天的童话中钟楚红一样当得起演技二字,钟楚红就不用说了,不信你看看李安的《饮食男女》中张艾嘉的演技。

3.这电影真煽情!我又要说我的口头禅:“操!要是搁两年前看,我肯定看哭了”

4.《恋曲1990》当作别后重逢的插曲再合适不过,应该把张艾嘉唱的《爱的代价》也放这电影里当插曲。

5.细节:一家人吃法国大餐,波波离席,发哥不懂装懂的点菜,对服务员说和他(波仔)的一样,结果上来后是两份儿童套餐,还滋滋的冒着焰火

 短评

不记得是多少年前,我看这个电影,大结局的时候,我哭得不成人形

7分钟前
  • 我来我征服
  • 力荐

当《你的样子》渐渐响起,眼泪就止不住了~~

11分钟前
  • 战国客
  • 推荐

周润发塑造的这个浪子让人看了就无法忘记,年轻时的放纵疯狂、出祸后的沉默和悔改都被表演的淋漓尽致。

13分钟前
  • 顾俏乜
  • 推荐

张艾嘉坐在周润发的小摩托后面,《恋曲1990》响起来的时候,太让人泪飚了。

17分钟前
  • mumudancing
  • 推荐

爱上浪子就像爱上大海,汹涌澎湃一望无际痛快并存。

22分钟前
  • 一只虎耳草
  • 力荐

很俗套的故事,但是不讨厌

27分钟前
  • 大宸
  • 还行

张艾嘉巅峰时期的好作品。内容俗套但看到最后你会发现自己早已热泪盈眶。

31分钟前
  • 半城风月
  • 力荐

黄坤玄的戏自然的很,恰到好处的好。剧作上写父子情,写浪子回头金不换都非常好,发哥的演绎真棒。

35分钟前
  • Morning
  • 力荐

结尾比较突兀,人物都很理想化。就是浪子回头金不换嘛。还是值得一看的,不过一直觉得那个时候讲的故事都好简单

37分钟前
  • 九尾黑猫
  • 还行

这部电影,最后一幕,当发哥饰演的阿郎,骑着赛车最终冲向终点,却终究因伤势太重,事故爆炸的时候,在场所有人所表现的那种情感张力,那种悲伤,至今仍旧记忆犹新。或许杯具总让人难以忘怀。浪子回头金不换,但有时却付出了生命的代价

40分钟前
  • 吃瓜小能手
  • 力荐

孤独的孩子,提着易碎的灯笼。

43分钟前
  • Enjoy_時光機。
  • 推荐

当放荡不羁的飚车浪子变成了久经生活沧桑的父亲,周润发对底层小人物的深谙,使《阿郎的故事》既有着年少的青春爱情,也有着支离破碎后的亲情羁绊, 那令人意外的悲情渲染,诚然稍显突兀,但一曲浪子悲歌,确也道尽了世间的悲欢离合。

48分钟前
  • 梦里诗书
  • 力荐

《恋曲1990》、《你的样子》……

50分钟前
  • 想不明白
  • 力荐

当年感动得不行.

54分钟前
  • 能工巧匠沙门哥
  • 力荐

都说浪子回头金不换,那么能拿来交换的只能是性命。

58分钟前
  • 高冷的鸡蛋仔
  • 力荐

乌溜溜的黑眼珠和你的笑脸,怎么也难忘记你容颜的转变。ps,认识"你的样子"就是因为小学时候看过无数次阿郎的片尾曲,那个烈火中的眼神印象太深了。

1小时前
  • 安蓝·怪伯爵𓆝𓆟𓆜
  • 力荐

最后5分钟的感动

1小时前
  • 影志
  • 推荐

我不知道如果没有这个令人潸然泪下的结尾,我会给这部电影打几分。但是它有,我也确实被感动了泪流满面,那就五星奉上。

1小时前
  • 有心打扰
  • 力荐

话说徐娇真的是星爷按着黄坤玄的样子选出来的?

1小时前
  • KeneL裤头
  • 推荐

杜琪峰34岁拍了这个电影,那一年,是1989。今晚,竟然,我是第一次看。不哭,几乎不可能。罗大佑的歌,是最催泪的子弹,最治愈的药。那个时候的香港电影,真是窝心温柔又浪漫逍遥,不怪那时的少年人,都看着港片学做男人。看这种电影的时候,你会觉得自己也是个好人。你以为这很容易,这种好转眼就没。

1小时前
  • 老晃
  • 推荐